Life Insurance and the Capital Dividend Account

Life Insurance and the Capital Dividend Account

Many business owners are unaware that corporate owned life insurance combined with the Capital Dividend Account (CDA) provides an opportunity to distribute corporate surplus on the death of a shareholder to the surviving shareholders or family members tax-free.

Income earned by a corporation and then distributed to a shareholder is subject to tax integration which results in the total tax paid between the two being approximately the same as if the shareholder earned the income directly. Integration also means that if a corporation is in receipt of funds which it received tax-free, then those funds should be tax-free when distributed to the shareholder.

The Capital Dividend Account is a notional account which tracks these particular tax-free amounts accumulated by the corporation. It is not shown in accounting records or financial statements of the corporation. If there is a balance in the CDA it may be shown in the notes section of the financial statements for information purposes only.

Generally, the tax-free amounts referred to, are the non-taxable portions of capital gains received by the corporation and the death benefit proceeds of life insurance policies where the corporation is the beneficiary.

Life insurance proceeds received by a private corporation

The death benefit of a life insurance policy that is owned by a private Canadian corporation less the adjusted cost basis (ACB) of that policy, can be credited to the Capital Dividend Account. The government’s reasoning in deducting the ACB from the CDA credit is that if the corporation had paid the premiums to the individual shareholder to pay for the insurance, those payments would have been taxable.

In calculating the ACB, the following factors are taken into account:

  • Premiums or deposits made to the policy increase the ACB;

  • Policy loans, paying of dividends in a participating policy and partial dispositions reduce the ACB;

  • Repaying policy loans, purchasing paid-up insurance and adding any term insurance riders increase the ACB;

  • The annual net cost of pure insurance (NCPI) reduces the ACB.

The NCPI is the pure mortality cost of the life insurance and is contained in a table in the Income Tax Act. The NCPI, which increases each year with age, is applied to the net amount at risk in determining the reduction of the ACB for that policy year. The net amount at risk is defined as the total death benefit minus the cash value of the policy.

Normally, the ACB of the policy increases each year ultimately resulting in a total erosion. Once the ACB reaches zero, the full amount of the death benefit is eligible for Capital Dividend Account credit.

Frequently asked questions about the Capital Dividend Account

Does the corporation have to be Canadian controlled? No. It is only required that the company is a Canadian private corporation.

Can the corporation be publicly owned? No. Only private corporations qualify.

What is the tax treatment of a Capital Dividend paid to a non-resident shareholder? Capital dividends paid to a non-resident shareholder are subject to a withholding tax. In the absence of a resident of a country without a Canadian tax treaty the withholding tax is 25%. With a tax treaty, the rate will be reduced. For an individual living in the U.S. for example the withholding rate would be 15%. The capital dividend would most likely be taxable to the non-resident in their own country.

Does the company still get a CDA credit when a policy is assigned to a bank and the death benefit is paid directly to the lender? Yes. Although the proceeds of the life insurance policy may never actually be received directly by the corporation, it still creates a CDA balance equal to the total death benefit minus the ACB of the policy.

For many business owners the ability to have life insurance paid with lower taxed corporate dollars and still be able to have the proceeds eventually flow to their families on a tax-free basis is an opportunity that should not be overlooked.

As always, please feel free to share this article with anyone you think would find it of interest.

Copyright @ 2025 FSB CONTENT MARKETING INC. – All Rights Reserved

How is Your Retirement Shaping Up?

How is Your Retirement Shaping Up?

Defined Benefit vs. Defined Contribution Pension Plans

If you are one of the lucky ones who participate in a pension plan, consider yourself to be very fortunate. Statistics show that only approximately one-third of paid workers in Canada are covered by a registered pension plan. * If your plan is a Defined Benefit Pension Plan (DBPP) you can consider yourself even more fortunate as this is considered to be the crown jewel of pension plans. The other type of plan available is a Defined Contribution Pension Plan (DCPP). So, how do these plans differ?

Defined Benefit Pension Plan

With a DBPP, your employer is obligated to pay you a pre-determined monthly income for the rest of your life after retirement. The amount of this income, or your pension, is calculated by applying a formula which can vary but is typically based on your highest average earnings and how long you have worked for your employer. For example, one common formula for an annual pension amount is 2% of your average yearly pensionable earnings during the best five earning years, times your years of pensionable service.

Let’s say that the average of your five best years is $75,000 per year and you have been a member of the pension plan for 22 years. Your annual pension would be $33,000 (2% X $75,000 X 22). The pension income is typically paid monthly to the retiree.

Usually, both the employee and the employer contribute to the plan. The employer is responsible for managing and assuming all the risk of the investments (this task is usually given to professional investment managers) and has an obligation to make the pension payments regardless of the performance.

Defined Contribution Pension Plan

Under a DCPP, the employee will contribute a certain percentage of their annual income (for example, 5%) with the employer typically making a matching contribution. Unlike with a DBPP there is some flexibility in how the contributions are invested. The plan may contain the ability for the individual to allocate his or her contributions according to their personal goals and risk tolerance. As in the DBPP, employers would usually avail themselves of investment managers to manage the pension funds.

Upon retirement, the amount of pension that an employee will receive will depend on to what amount the contributions have grown. Unlike a DBPP, there is no guarantee. In this way, the DCPP is similar to a group RRSP but is subject to pension legislation to prevent withdrawals prior to retirement.

Generally, the costs associated with Defined Benefit Plans are considerably higher than with Defined Contributions. This is partially due to the actuarial valuation which is required every three years for a DBPP. There is more cost control with a DCPP. While both plans are very effective in encouraging employee attraction, Defined Benefit Plans are more successful in creating long term retention.

What Plan Do You Have?

One-third of paid workers in Canada are covered by a registered pension plan with public sector workers accounting for a little more than half of all pension plan members. The question is, if you aren’t a member of one of these large plans, how is your retirement shaping up? A 2023 Canadian Retirement Survey conducted by the Healthcare of Ontario Pension plan, found that 32% of Canadians have set aside nothing for retirement. If you are included in this number be sure to contact me as soon as possible so we can discuss your retirement future.

* Statistics Canada.

Copyright @ 2024 FSB Content Marketing Inc.- All Rights Reserved

Family Business Planning Strategies

Family Business Planning Strategies

67% are at Risk of Succession Failure

If you are an owner in a family enterprise, the likelihood of your business successfully transitioning to the next generations is not very good. This has not changed over the years. Statistics show a failure rate of:

  • 67% of businesses fail to succeed into the second generation

  • 90% fail by the third generation

With 80% to 90% of all enterprises in North America being family owned, it is important to address the reasons why transition is difficult.

Why does this happen and what can you do to prevent it?

Communicate

Family enterprises are often put at risk by family dynamics. This can be especially true if the family has not had any meaningful dialogue on the succession of the business. And, while we are throwing around statistics, it has been estimated that 65% of families have not had any meaningful discussion about business succession.

  • Family issues can often hijack or delay the planning process. Sibling rivalries, family disputes, health issues and other concerns certainly present challenges that need to be dealt with in order for the succession plan to move forward.

  • Many times, a founder of a family business looks to rely on the business to provide him or her with a comfortable retirement while the children view the shares of the company as their inheritance.

  • Sometimes an appropriate family successor is not readily identifiable or not available at all.

Decide

  • In these times a decision needs to be made as to whether or not ownership needs to be separated from management, at least until the second generation is willing or capable to assume the reins of management.

  • If the founder needs to receive value or future income from the business a proper decision as to who is running the company is vital. If this is not forthcoming, then there may be no other alternative but to sell the company.

Plan

Tax Planning

When planning for the succession of the business an important objective is to reduce income tax on the disposition (sale or inheritance). One of the methods is to implement an estate freeze which transfers the future taxable growth to the next generation. The corporate and trust structure utilized in this strategy may also create multiple Small Business Gains Exemptions which can reduce or eliminate the income tax on capital gains.

Just as it is important for a business owner to plan to reduce taxes during his or her lifetime, it is also important to maximize the value of the estate by planning to reduce taxes at death.

Minimize Management and Shareholder Disputes

This can be accomplished with the implementation of a Shareholders’ Agreement. Often there are multiple parties that should be subject to the terms of the agreement, including any Holding Companies or Trusts that may be created to deal with the tax planning issues. The Shareholders’ Agreement will include the procedures to deal with any shareholder disputes as well as confer rights and restrictions on the shareholders. The agreement should also define the exit strategy that the business owners may wish to employ.

Estate Equalization

Often the family business represents the bulk of the family fortune. There are times that one or more children may be involved in the company while the other siblings are not. Proper planning is necessary to ensure that the children are treated fairly in the succession plan for the business when the founder dies.

One method often employed in this regard is for the children active in the business to receive the shares as per the will or shareholders’ agreement while the non-business children receive other assets or the proceeds of a life insurance policy.

Founder’s Retirement Plan

It is problematic that often a business owner’s wealth may be represented by up to 80% of his or her company’s worth. It is important that the founder develops a retirement plan independent of the business so that his or retirement is not unduly affected by any business setback.

Protecting the Company’s Share Value

Risk management should be employed to provide for any unforeseen circumstances that would have the effect of reducing share value. As previously mentioned, if the bulk of a family’s wealth is represented by the shares the family holds in the business, a significant reduction in that share value could prove catastrophic to the family. These unforeseen circumstances include the death, disability or serious health issues of those vital to the success of the business, especially the founder. Proper risk management will help to ensure that the business will survive for the benefit of future generations and continue to provide for the security of the founder and/or his or her spouse.

Act

Since the dynamics of family businesses differ from non-family firms, particular attention is required in the planning for the management and succession of these enterprises. This planning should not be left until it is too late – it is never too soon to begin.

As always, please feel free to share this information with anyone that may find it of interest.

Copyright @ 2024 FSB Content Marketing Inc.- All Rights Reserved

Estate Planning Tips for Real Estate Investors

Estate Planning Tips for Real Estate Investors

 

For many Canadians, the majority of their wealth is held in personally owned real estate. For most this will be limited to their principal residence, however, investment in recreational and real estate investment property also forms a substantial part of some estates. Due to the nature of real estate, it is important to utilize estate planning to realize optimum gain and minimize tax implications.

Key Considerations for Real Estate Investment

  • Real estate is not a qualifying investment for the purposes of the Lifetime Capital Gains Exemption.

  • Leaving taxable property to a spouse through a spousal rollover in the will defers the tax until the spouse sells the property or dies.

  • Apart from the principal residence, real estate often creates a need for liquidity due to capital gains, estate equalization, mortgage repayment or other considerations.

  • Professional advice is often required to select the most advantageous ownership structure (i.e. personal, trust, holding company).

The Impact of Capital Gains Taxes

  • Upon the disposition (sale or transfer) of an asset, there is income tax payable based on 2/3 (66.67%) (as of June 25, 2024) of the capital gain of that asset.

  • Capital gains taxes can be triggered at death unless the asset is left to a spouse in which case the tax is deferred until the spouse sells the asset or dies.

  • In addition, there may be probate fees levied against the estate at death.

Why is Estate Planning Important?

It is recommended that family issues (including estate equalization) be addressed with certain types of real estate assets. Estate planning can organize your assets with the objective to ensure that at your death they are distributed according to your wishes:

  • to the proper beneficiary(s),

  • with a minimum of taxes and costs

  • with the least amount of family discord.

Tax and Estate Planning Strategies for Real Estate Holdings

Principal Residence

  • If your home qualifies as a principal residence, there is no tax on any capital gains upon sale or transfer of the property. An individual can only have one principal residence and the same holds true for a family unit (for example, both spouses have only one principal residence between them).

  • If the property is held as joint tenants, upon the death of a spouse, the ownership automatically remains with the surviving spouse. Upon the death of the surviving spouse, his or her will dictates who will receive ownership of the home (usually one or more of the children).

  • In preparing your estate planning for your principal residence, you may wish to ensure that you have sufficient liquidity to cover the cost of any property tax deferral program that you have exercised. This is especially important if the home is intended to be retained by the beneficiary(s) and you don’t want to burden them with the significant cost of repayment.

  • Planning for the beneficiaries to retain the property often creates discord if the children are not all in agreement about the final disposition of the house. Should you just wish to leave the home to one child and not to the others consider estate equalization and use cash, other assets or life insurance as a replacement to the interest in the home.

To maintain family harmony, considerable thought should be given when making decisions to bequeath or liquidate the family cottage or recreational property.

Recreational Property

  • If the sale, transfer or deemed disposition at death of the cottage or other recreational property results in a capital gain, that gain will be taxable. As in the principal residence, ownership could be in joint tenancy which will defer the tax. The tax will also be deferred if the property is left to your spouse in your will.

  • There may be some concern that if the property is left outright to the spouse and the spouse remarries the property may ultimately end up with someone who was not intended as a beneficiary. To avoid this, a trust could be used to hold ownership of the property. A spousal trust created in the will also accomplishes this while at the same time maintaining the spousal rollover to avoid tax on the gain of the property. In addition, the spousal trust has an added advantage in that it allows the testator to specify who will inherit the property on the spouse’s death.

Real Estate Investment Property

  • Sale, transfer or deemed disposition (at death), usually will result in a capital gain or capital loss. If the property in question is rental property, depreciation (known as capital cost allowance) may be claimed as a deduction against rental income. At death, if the fair market value of the rental property exceeds its undepreciated capital cost, there will be a tax payable on the recaptured depreciation. A value of less than undepreciated capital cost will create a capital loss which, in year of death, can be deducted against other income.

  • If the property in question is performing favourably as an investment, it may be desirable to leave it to the surviving family members. In this case, it is recommended that any liquidity requirement for taxes, costs etc. be funded to alleviate the financial burden.

  • From a planning point of view, it may be advisable to own commercial real estate through a holding company. Depending on the circumstances the same could be true with rental property.

Solving the Liquidity Need

One of the most cost-effective methods in providing the necessary liquidity in these situations is the use of second-to-die joint life insurance.

The Insurance Solution

  • Tax-free cash at the second death. Naming a beneficiary bypasses the will and is not subject to probate.

  • The proceeds are protected against creditor claims.

  • Insurance provides for a guaranteed low-cost alternative to the issue of satisfying the liquidity need at death.

Please call me if you would like to discuss your personal estate planning needs. As always, feel free to use the sharing buttons to forward this article to a friend or family member you think may benefit from this information.

Copyright © 2024 FSB Content Marketing Inc – All Rights Reserved